Re: [PATCH] PCI / ACPI / PM: Use correct power state strings in messages

From: Bjorn Helgaas
Date: Fri Jun 14 2013 - 13:09:13 EST


On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 4:29 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Make acpi_pci_set_power_state() print the name of the ACPI device
> power state the device has been actually put into instead of printing
> the name of the requested PCI device power state, which need not be
> the same.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>
> For 3.11.
>
> Thanks,
> Rafael
>
> ---
> drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> Index: linux-pm/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c
> +++ linux-pm/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c
> @@ -211,7 +211,7 @@ static int acpi_pci_set_power_state(stru
>
> if (!error)
> dev_info(&dev->dev, "power state changed by ACPI to %s\n",
> - pci_power_name(state));
> + acpi_power_state_string(state_conv[state]));
>
> return error;
> }
>

Just to double-check this, it *looks* like the effective change is
that for PCI_D3hot and PCI_D3cold, we'll print "(unknown)" instead of
"D3hot" and "D3cold" because state_conv[] folds both PCI_D3hot and
PCI_D3cold into ACPI_STATE_D3, and acpi_power_state_string() doesn't
have a case for ACPI_STATE_D3.

Is that what you intended?

Bjorn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/