[PATCH] tty/vt: Return EBUSY if deallocating VT1 and it is busy

From: Ross Lagerwall
Date: Fri Jun 14 2013 - 18:24:53 EST


Commit 421b40a6286e ("tty/vt: Fix vc_deallocate() lock order") changed
the behavior when deallocating VT 1. Previously if trying to
deallocate VT1 and it is busy, we would return EBUSY. The commit
changed this to return 0 (success).

This commit restores the old behavior.

Signed-off-by: Ross Lagerwall <rosslagerwall@xxxxxxxxx>
---
On 06/14/2013 05:35 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> p.s. In the future, please cc: the people who handled the patch you are
> asking about, otherwise stuff like this often gets missed in the noise
> of lkml.

Yes, sorry about that. I only remembered after I sent the email.

drivers/tty/vt/vt_ioctl.c | 5 +----
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/tty/vt/vt_ioctl.c b/drivers/tty/vt/vt_ioctl.c
index fc2c06c..2bd78e2 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/vt/vt_ioctl.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/vt/vt_ioctl.c
@@ -289,13 +289,10 @@ static int vt_disallocate(unsigned int vc_num)
struct vc_data *vc = NULL;
int ret = 0;

- if (!vc_num)
- return 0;
-
console_lock();
if (VT_BUSY(vc_num))
ret = -EBUSY;
- else
+ else if (vc_num)
vc = vc_deallocate(vc_num);
console_unlock();

--
1.8.3.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/