Re: [patch v8 8/9] sched: consider runnable load average in move_tasks
From: Paul Turner
Date: Mon Jun 17 2013 - 06:59:14 EST
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 12:20 AM, Alex Shi <alex.shi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Except using runnable load average in background, move_tasks is also
> the key functions in load balance. We need consider the runnable load
> average in it in order to the apple to apple load comparison.
>
> Morten had caught a div u64 bug on ARM, thanks!
>
> Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> kernel/sched/fair.c | 16 ++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index eadd2e7..3aa1dc0 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -4178,11 +4178,14 @@ static int tg_load_down(struct task_group *tg, void *data)
> long cpu = (long)data;
>
> if (!tg->parent) {
> - load = cpu_rq(cpu)->load.weight;
> + load = cpu_rq(cpu)->avg.load_avg_contrib;
> } else {
> + unsigned long tmp_rla;
> + tmp_rla = tg->parent->cfs_rq[cpu]->runnable_load_avg + 1;
> +
> load = tg->parent->cfs_rq[cpu]->h_load;
> - load *= tg->se[cpu]->load.weight;
> - load /= tg->parent->cfs_rq[cpu]->load.weight + 1;
> + load *= tg->se[cpu]->avg.load_avg_contrib;
> + load /= tmp_rla;
Why do we need the temporary here?
> }
>
> tg->cfs_rq[cpu]->h_load = load;
> @@ -4208,12 +4211,9 @@ static void update_h_load(long cpu)
> static unsigned long task_h_load(struct task_struct *p)
> {
> struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq = task_cfs_rq(p);
> - unsigned long load;
> -
> - load = p->se.load.weight;
> - load = div_u64(load * cfs_rq->h_load, cfs_rq->load.weight + 1);
>
> - return load;
> + return div64_ul(p->se.avg.load_avg_contrib * cfs_rq->h_load,
> + cfs_rq->runnable_load_avg + 1);
> }
> #else
> static inline void update_blocked_averages(int cpu)
> --
> 1.7.12
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/