Re: [PATCHv2 0/6] Make ARM's sched_clock generic + 64 bit friendly
From: John Stultz
Date: Mon Jun 17 2013 - 14:14:16 EST
On 06/17/2013 11:02 AM, Baruch Siach wrote:
to send
>it by Thomas for 3.11 this week.
Good, thanks. This means that the xtensa ccount sched_clock patch
(http://lists.linux-xtensa.org/pipermail/linux-xtensa/Week-of-Mon-20130617/001077.html)
that depends on the third patch in this series, can go in for 3.11, if the
xtensa maintainer acks it (added to Cc). How should we handle the dependency
then?
Well, Thomas hasn't picked them up yet, so he could still object, so no
promises yet :)
As for the dependency, either you can base your patches off of
tip/timers/core (once the patches land there) and send a pull request to
the maintainer (so he gets the dependencies in -tip), or we can see
about queuing your changes via tip/timers/core (assuming you get
maintainer acks).
thanks
-john
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/