Re: [PATCH V1] ceph: fix sleeping function called from invalidcontext.

[Sage Weil]

Applied, thanks!


On Wed, 19 Jun 2013, majianpeng wrote:

> [ 1121.231883] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/rwsem.c:20
> [ 1121.231935] in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, pid: 9831, name: mv
> [ 1121.231971] 1 lock held by mv/9831:
> [ 1121.231973]  #0:  (&(&ci->i_ceph_lock)->rlock){+.+...},at:[<ffffffffa02bbd38>] ceph_getxattr+0x58/0x1d0 [ceph]
> [ 1121.231998] CPU: 3 PID: 9831 Comm: mv Not tainted 3.10.0-rc6+ #215
> [ 1121.232000] Hardware name: To Be Filled By O.E.M. To Be Filled By
> O.E.M./To be filled by O.E.M., BIOS 080015  11/09/2011
> [ 1121.232027]  ffff88006d355a80 ffff880092f69ce0 ffffffff8168348c ffff880092f69cf8
> [ 1121.232045]  ffffffff81070435 ffff88006d355a20 ffff880092f69d20 ffffffff816899ba
> [ 1121.232052]  0000000300000004 ffff8800b76911d0 ffff88006d355a20 ffff880092f69d68
> [ 1121.232056] Call Trace:
> [ 1121.232062]  [<ffffffff8168348c>] dump_stack+0x19/0x1b
> [ 1121.232067]  [<ffffffff81070435>] __might_sleep+0xe5/0x110
> [ 1121.232071]  [<ffffffff816899ba>] down_read+0x2a/0x98
> [ 1121.232080]  [<ffffffffa02baf70>] ceph_vxattrcb_layout+0x60/0xf0 [ceph]
> [ 1121.232088]  [<ffffffffa02bbd7f>] ceph_getxattr+0x9f/0x1d0 [ceph]
> [ 1121.232093]  [<ffffffff81188d28>] vfs_getxattr+0xa8/0xd0
> [ 1121.232097]  [<ffffffff8118900b>] getxattr+0xab/0x1c0
> [ 1121.232100]  [<ffffffff811704f2>] ? final_putname+0x22/0x50
> [ 1121.232104]  [<ffffffff81155f80>] ? kmem_cache_free+0xb0/0x260
> [ 1121.232107]  [<ffffffff811704f2>] ? final_putname+0x22/0x50
> [ 1121.232110]  [<ffffffff8109e63d>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0x10
> [ 1121.232114]  [<ffffffff816957a7>] ? sysret_check+0x1b/0x56
> [ 1121.232120]  [<ffffffff81189c9c>] SyS_fgetxattr+0x6c/0xc0
> [ 1121.232125]  [<ffffffff81695782>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
> [ 1121.232129] BUG: scheduling while atomic: mv/9831/0x10000002
> [ 1121.232154] 1 lock held by mv/9831:
> [ 1121.232156]  #0:  (&(&ci->i_ceph_lock)->rlock){+.+...}, at:
> [<ffffffffa02bbd38>] ceph_getxattr+0x58/0x1d0 [ceph]
> 
> I think move the ci->i_ceph_lock down is safe because we can't free
> ceph_inode_info at there.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jianpeng Ma <majianpeng@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  fs/ceph/xattr.c | 9 +++++----
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/ceph/xattr.c b/fs/ceph/xattr.c
> index 9b6b2b6..be661d8 100644
> --- a/fs/ceph/xattr.c
> +++ b/fs/ceph/xattr.c
> @@ -675,17 +675,18 @@ ssize_t ceph_getxattr(struct dentry *dentry, const char *name, void *value,
>  	if (!ceph_is_valid_xattr(name))
>  		return -ENODATA;
>  
> -	spin_lock(&ci->i_ceph_lock);
> -	dout("getxattr %p ver=%lld index_ver=%lld\n", inode,
> -	     ci->i_xattrs.version, ci->i_xattrs.index_version);
>  
>  	/* let's see if a virtual xattr was requested */
>  	vxattr = ceph_match_vxattr(inode, name);
>  	if (vxattr && !(vxattr->exists_cb && !vxattr->exists_cb(ci))) {
>  		err = vxattr->getxattr_cb(ci, value, size);
> -		goto out;
> +		return err;
>  	}
>  
> +	spin_lock(&ci->i_ceph_lock);
> +	dout("getxattr %p ver=%lld index_ver=%lld\n", inode,
> +	     ci->i_xattrs.version, ci->i_xattrs.index_version);
> +
>  	if (__ceph_caps_issued_mask(ci, CEPH_CAP_XATTR_SHARED, 1) &&
>  	    (ci->i_xattrs.index_version >= ci->i_xattrs.version)) {
>  		goto get_xattr;
> -- 
> 1.8.3.rc1.44.gb387c77
> N????y????b?????v?????{.n??????z??ay????????j???f????????????????:+v??????????zZ+??????"?!?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/