Re: [PATCH 0/3] tracing/perf: perf_trace_buf/perf_xxx hacks.

[Oleg Nesterov]

On 06/19, David Ahern wrote:
>
> On 6/19/13 11:51 AM, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>>
>> not sure these numbers actually mean
>> something, but still.

Yes.

>> So, the test-case:
>>
>> 	int pipe1[2], pipe2[2];
>
> Same as "perf bench sched pipe"

You just cruelly disclosed the fact that I do not use perf.

Thanks. So,

	# perf record -e sched:sched_switch -p1 &
	[1] 516
	# perf bench sched pipe

3 times.

before:

     Total time: 30.119 [sec]

      30.119501 usecs/op
          33201 ops/sec

     Total time: 30.634 [sec]

      30.634105 usecs/op
          32643 ops/sec

     Total time: 30.100 [sec]

      30.100209 usecs/op
          33222 ops/sec


after:

     Total time: 29.645 [sec]

      29.645941 usecs/op
          33731 ops/sec

     Total time: 29.759 [sec]

      29.759075 usecs/op
          33603 ops/sec

     Total time: 29.803 [sec]

      29.803522 usecs/op
          33553 ops/sec

Hmm. Actually sched-pipe.c is a bit more "heavy", it does switch_mm().
And I used taskset. But it seems that this test-case shows the similar
results.

Oleg.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/