RE: [PATCH v3 2/4] MFD: Palmas: Add SMPS10_BOOST feature

[J, KEERTHY]

Hi Samuel,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Samuel Ortiz [mailto:sameo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2013 2:38 PM
> To: J, KEERTHY
> Cc: broonie@xxxxxxxxxx; ldewangan@xxxxxxxxxx;
> grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxxxx; swarren@xxxxxxxxxx; linux-
> kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-doc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; devicetree-
> discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; gg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-
> omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] MFD: Palmas: Add SMPS10_BOOST feature
> 
> Hi,
> 
> On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 04:34:42AM +0000, J, KEERTHY wrote:
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: J, KEERTHY
> > > Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2013 11:28 AM
> > > To: linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > Cc: broonie@xxxxxxxxxx; J, KEERTHY; ldewangan@xxxxxxxxxx;
> > > sameo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxxxx;
> > > swarren@xxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> > > linux-doc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; devicetree- discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> > > gg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > Subject: [PATCH v3 2/4] MFD: Palmas: Add SMPS10_BOOST feature
> > >
> > > From: J Keerthy <j-keerthy@xxxxxx>
> > >
> > > The SMPS10 regulator is not presesnt in all the variants of the
> > > PALMAS PMIC family. Hence adding a feature to distingush between
> them.
> > >
> >
> > Could you please pull this patch?
> I'm reverting this one for now as of_match_device is not define for
> !CONFIG_OF.

So the of_match_device parts can come under #ifdef CONFIG_OF?

> 
> Cheers,
> Samuel.
> 
> --
> Intel Open Source Technology Centre
> http://oss.intel.com/

Regards,
Keerthy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/