Re: [PATCH v6 4/8] ARM: Add .init_platform() callback to machine descriptor

[Arnd Bergmann]

On Friday 21 June 2013, Tomasz Figa wrote:

> > To me, this new hook is strictly equivalent to init_irq. What do we gain
> > exactly? I didn't think init_irq was going away...
> > 
> > I know init_irq is not pretty, and we tend to overload it with other
> > stuff, but I don't really see the point of adding a new callback that
> > has the exact same properties.
> 
> Well, it doesn't really give us any functional benefits.
> 
> However in my opinion it looks much saner in case of DT-only platforms that 
> don't need any specific IRQ initialization, but need to call some platform 
> specific initialization routines, after memory management, but before 
> anything else is initialized.
> 
> This way irqchip_init() doesn't have to be explicitly called in platform 
> code.
> 
> Anyway, I don't have any strong opinion on this. If it is perfectly fine to 
> abuse irqchip_init() for anything that must be done at this stage of boot, 
> then I'm fine with this either and will modify the board file from further 
> patch from this series to not rely on this change any more.

Your init_platform only has these two calls in it:

+       of_clk_init(NULL);
+       samsung_wdt_reset_of_init();

Presumably you need of_clk_init() for the watchdog to work. But do you actually
need to initialize the reset logic this early? Why not turn
samsung_wdt_reset_of_init into a standalone driver, or call it from init_machine?

I would actually like to call of_clk_init from common code at some point
between init_irq and init_time, although I'm not sure if some platforms
need it to be called before init_irq.

	Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/