Re: [PATCH 0/2] *** SUBJECT HERE ***

[Anders Hammarquist]

In a message of Fri, 21 Jun 2013 16:56:03 -0700, Greg KH writes:
>Please resend this in a format that I can apply it in (i.e. one that
>does not require me to edit it by hand...)

After more fighting with git, I belive I now made it spit out what I
wanted. Patch 1/2 ahead.

>> -static struct usb_device_id ti_id_table_3410[15+TI_EXTRA_VID_PID_COUNT+1] = {
>> +static struct usb_device_id ti_id_table_3410[16+TI_EXTRA_VID_PID_COUNT+1] = {
>
>That's a mess, why have it be a static array at all?  Just include an
>empty one at the end.

Indeed. I'd already had some (failed) thoughts about how to handle it
nicely. Now I've had another think through, and I have something which
deals with it and at least complains if TI_EXTRA_VID_PID_COUNT is changed
without changing the initializer. Patch 2/2

/Anders
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/