[PATCH v4 net-next 0/1] net: lls select poll support
From: Eliezer Tamir
Date: Mon Jun 24 2013 - 03:28:10 EST
David,
Here is a rework of the select/poll patch.
When select or poll are used on a lot of sockets the sysctl value
needs to be set higher than 50. For 300 sockets a setting of 100 works
for me. For 1000 sockets a setting of 200 works well but the gain is
very small, probably not worth it.
I should mention that unlike the version we had in v9, with this version
of the patch, LLS always performs better than no LLS.
In this version I split the sysctl entries into two.
sysctl.net.core.low_latency_read for blocking socket reads.
sysctl.net.core.low_latency_poll for select/poll.
The main reason we need two sysctl entries is that the values are different.
This also allows poll to busy poll only on some sockets.
You set sysctl.net.core.low_latency_poll, but leave the read value 0.
Then you use the socket option to enable SO_LL only on the sockets
you would like to buys poll on.
Maybe what we really want is a cgroup that would allow settings
per-process group.
-Eliezer
Change log:
v4
- cleaned up formatting
v3
- split sysctl value into two separate ones, one for read and one for poll.
- updated Documentation/sysctl/net.txt
- fixed possible overflow (again) reported by Eric Dumazet.
- poll/select loop optimizations by Eric Dumazet and Willem de Bruijn.
v2
- added POLL_LL flag, used to signal between the syscalls and sock_poll().
- add a separate ll_end_time() function to be used from poll.
- slight reorder of sk_poll_ll so the timing primitives are not used
when called from sock_poll().
- select/poll stop busy polling as soon as there is something to return
to the user.
Change log from the original LLS patch series:
v9
- better mask testing in sock_poll(), reported by Eric Dumazet.
v8
- split out udp and select/poll into separate patches.
what used to be patch 2/5 is now three patches.
v5
- added simple poll/select support
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/