Re: frequent softlockups with 3.10rc6.
From: Oleg Nesterov
Date: Mon Jun 24 2013 - 12:41:54 EST
On 06/24, Dave Jones wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 10:52:29AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> > > > check_list_nodes corruption. next->prev should be prev (ffff88023b8a1a08), but was 00ffff88023b8a1a. (next=ffff880243288001).
> > >
> > > Can't find "check_list_nodes" in lib/list_debug.c or elsewhere...
> > >
> > > > [<ffffffff816e467d>] dump_stack+0x19/0x1b
> > > > [<ffffffff8104a0c1>] warn_slowpath_common+0x61/0x80
> > > > [<ffffffff8104a12c>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x4c/0x50
> > > > [<ffffffff81112c61>] rb_head_page_deactivate.isra.39+0x61/0x80
> > >
> > > How? rb_list_head_clear() just modifies list->next directly.
> > >
> > > > hopefully despite that it'll actually function as intended.
> > >
> > > Yes ;)
> >
> > I'm curious to what happened.
>
> Ah, this is the first victim of my new 'check sanity of nodes during list walks' patch.
> It's doing the same prev->next next->prev checking as list_add and friends.
> I'm looking at getting it into shape for a 3.12 merge after some other preparatory patches
> go into 3.11
So you used the patched kernel when you hit the lockups ?
What else was changed?
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/