Re: [PATCH 22/45] percpu_counter: Use get/put_online_cpus_atomic()to prevent CPU offline

[Tejun Heo]

On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 07:12:59PM +0530, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
> Once stop_machine() is gone from the CPU offline path, we won't be able
> to depend on disabling preemption to prevent CPUs from going offline
> from under us.
> 
> Use the get/put_online_cpus_atomic() APIs to prevent CPUs from going
> offline, while invoking from atomic context.
> 
> Cc: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
...
> @@ -98,6 +98,7 @@ s64 __percpu_counter_sum(struct percpu_counter *fbc)
>  	s64 ret;
>  	int cpu;
>  
> +	get_online_cpus_atomic();
>  	raw_spin_lock(&fbc->lock);
>  	ret = fbc->count;
>  	for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
> @@ -105,6 +106,7 @@ s64 __percpu_counter_sum(struct percpu_counter *fbc)
>  		ret += *pcount;
>  	}
>  	raw_spin_unlock(&fbc->lock);
> +	put_online_cpus_atomic();

I don't think this is necessary.  CPU on/offlining is explicitly
handled via the hotplug callback which synchronizes through fbc->lock.
__percpu_counter_sum() racing with actual on/offlining doesn't affect
correctness and adding superflous get_online_cpus_atomic() around it
can be misleading.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/