Re: [PATCH 0/4] Fix more issues with generic pinconf bindings

[James Hogan]

On 25/06/13 13:55, Heiko StÃbner wrote:
> As Stephen Warren pointed out, some pinconf bindings had deficits
> either in documentation or in the whole thought process.
> 
> Therefore this series tries to fix these issues by improving
> documentation and removing the real controversial bindings for now.
> 
> Of the changed pinconf bindings only the slew-rate had an acutal
> current user (since yesterday). James I hope it's ok to simply
> remove the slew-rate handling from the tz1090 driver until we can
> handle it correctly in dt.

Other than my comment about patch 3 (which since it's the only case I
don't mind too much, it can easily be added back again in the future):

Reviewed-by: James Hogan <james.hogan@xxxxxxxxxx>

Cheers
James

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/