Re: [PATCH 3/4] pinctrl: remove slew-rate parameter from tz1090
From: James Hogan
Date: Tue Jun 25 2013 - 10:57:41 EST
On 25/06/13 14:22, Linus Walleij wrote:
> Can't we just try to come up with a patch that nails down the meaning of
> slew rate in some meaningful manner then?
>
> So according to:
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slew_rate
> a proper expression for slew rate would be dV/dt i.e.
> something like microvolts per microsecond (which then just
> becomes volts/second).
>
> What we need to figure out is what range will be applicable within
> reasonable doubt for current scenarios and the next few years.
>
> What are your datasheets specifying here, and what would be
> a proper measure?
My datasheet says:
0: slow (half frequency)
1: fast
I just got a reply back from a hardware engineer, who said that the
relationship with the actual volts/usec will depend on both the drive
strength and the load on the pad, and that a definite answer probably
requires running a simulation.
Cheers
James
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/