Re: [PATCH v2 03/14] perf: Add persistent event facilities

[Borislav Petkov]

On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 12:51:35PM +0200, Robert Richter wrote:
> On 25.06.13 11:37:06, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 11:24:39AM +0200, Robert Richter wrote:
> > > I also see 'pers_' not as an optimum since it could be mixed-up easily
> > > with 'perf_'. Maybe we take 'persist_' instead?
> > 
> > Yep, although it reads wrong:
> > 
> > perf_add_persist_event
> 
> We could use persist_ as prefix for static functions and use the long
> versions for the interface only.
> 
> But all this is a bit bikeshedding. I am sure we find something.

How about

perf_add_pevent?

It is nice and short, although maybe too short but "pevent" is almost
like a special term and the name shows that it is a special type of
event, i.e. a p-event.

:-)

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/