Re: frequent softlockups with 3.10rc6.

[Dave Jones]

On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 01:21:30PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
 > On Tue, 2013-06-25 at 12:55 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
 > 
 > > While I've been spinning wheels trying to reproduce that softlockup bug,
 > > On another machine I've been refining my list-walk debug patch.
 > > I added an ugly "ok, the ringbuffer is playing games with lower two bits" special case.
 > > 
 > > But what the hell is going on here ?
 > > 
 > > next->prev should be prev (ffff88023c6cdd18), but was 00ffff88023c6cdd. (next=ffff880243288001).
 > > 
 > > (trace comes from the same ringbuffer code)
 > 
 > What's the above saying?  ffff880243288000->prev == 00ffff88023c6cdd but
 > it should have been ffff88023c6cdd18? That is: ffff88023c6cdd18->next ==
 > ffff880243288001?

It's saying something has done >>8 on a pointer, and stuck it in a list head.

 > Not sure how that would mess up. The ring-buffer code has lots of
 > integrity checks to make sure nothing like this breaks.

My integrity checks can beat up your integrity checks.

	Dav

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/