Re: [PATCH 1/8] perf,x86: disable PEBS-LL in intel_pmu_pebs_disable()
From: Stephane Eranian
Date: Wed Jun 26 2013 - 03:35:48 EST
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 10:44 AM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 04:20:41PM +0200, Stephane Eranian wrote:
>> Make sure intel_pmu_pebs_disable() and intel_pmu_pebs_enable()
>> are symmetrical w.r.t. PEBS-LL and precise store.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Stephane Eranian <eranian@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> This seems unrelated to the actual patch series and should still go in.
>
Yes, it is unrelated. I just ran into it while testing the patch.
It was missing since the beginning, it seems.
>
>> ---
>> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_ds.c | 6 ++++++
>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_ds.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_ds.c
>> index ed3e553..3065c57 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_ds.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_ds.c
>> @@ -653,6 +653,12 @@ void intel_pmu_pebs_disable(struct perf_event *event)
>> struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw;
>>
>> cpuc->pebs_enabled &= ~(1ULL << hwc->idx);
>> +
>> + if (event->hw.constraint->flags & PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_LDLAT)
>> + cpuc->pebs_enabled &= ~(1ULL << (hwc->idx + 32));
>> + else if (event->hw.constraint->flags & PERF_X86_EVENT_PEBS_ST)
>> + cpuc->pebs_enabled &= ~(1ULL << 63);
>> +
>> if (cpuc->enabled)
>> wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_PEBS_ENABLE, cpuc->pebs_enabled);
>>
>> --
>> 1.8.1.2
>>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/