Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] x86/tboot: Fail extended mode reduced hardware sleep

[Ben Guthro]

On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 10:44 AM, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> On 26.06.13 at 16:06, Ben Guthro <benjamin.guthro@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/tboot.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/tboot.c
>> @@ -273,7 +273,8 @@ static void tboot_copy_fadt(const struct acpi_table_fadt *fadt)
>>               offsetof(struct acpi_table_facs, firmware_waking_vector);
>>  }
>>
>> -static int tboot_sleep(u8 sleep_state, u32 pm1a_control, u32 pm1b_control)
>> +static int tboot_sleep(u8 sleep_state, u32 pm1a_control, u32 pm1b_control,
>> +                    u8 extended)
>
> I don't see why this couldn't remain "bool" - the only complain was
> that ACPI CA shouldn't use it.
>
> Jan

I changed it, in order to keep the prototypes consistent.
Having the function pointer be defined with one signature in the
acpica code, and another in the os implementation seems like a
maintenance problem.

Ben

>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/