[PATCH v2 6/9] ACPI: change acpi_[bay|dock]_match() in scan.c as global functions
From: Jiang Liu
Date: Wed Jun 26 2013 - 12:34:12 EST
From: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@xxxxxxxxxx>
Function acpi_[bay|dock]_match() in scan.c could be shared with dock.c
to reduce duplicated code, so refine and change them as global functions.
Also add a new function acpi_ata_match() to check whether an ACPI object
device is an ATA device.
Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Jiang Liu <liuj97@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
Cc: linux-acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
---
drivers/acpi/scan.c | 82 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------
include/acpi/acpi_bus.h | 3 ++
2 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/scan.c b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
index dfe76f1..3ddba74 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/scan.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
@@ -1532,46 +1532,45 @@ static void acpi_device_get_busid(struct acpi_device *device)
}
/*
+ * acpi_ata_match - see if an acpi object is an ATA device
+ *
+ * If an acpi object has one of the ACPI ATA methods defined,
+ * then we can safely call it an ATA device.
+ */
+bool acpi_ata_match(acpi_handle handle)
+{
+ return acpi_has_method(handle, "_GTF") ||
+ acpi_has_method(handle, "_GTM") ||
+ acpi_has_method(handle, "_STM") ||
+ acpi_has_method(handle, "_SDD");
+}
+
+/*
* acpi_bay_match - see if an acpi object is an ejectable driver bay
*
* If an acpi object is ejectable and has one of the ACPI ATA methods defined,
* then we can safely call it an ejectable drive bay
*/
-static int acpi_bay_match(acpi_handle handle)
+bool acpi_bay_match(acpi_handle handle)
{
- acpi_status status;
- acpi_handle tmp;
acpi_handle phandle;
- status = acpi_get_handle(handle, "_EJ0", &tmp);
- if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
- return -ENODEV;
-
- if ((ACPI_SUCCESS(acpi_get_handle(handle, "_GTF", &tmp))) ||
- (ACPI_SUCCESS(acpi_get_handle(handle, "_GTM", &tmp))) ||
- (ACPI_SUCCESS(acpi_get_handle(handle, "_STM", &tmp))) ||
- (ACPI_SUCCESS(acpi_get_handle(handle, "_SDD", &tmp))))
- return 0;
-
- if (acpi_get_parent(handle, &phandle))
- return -ENODEV;
-
- if ((ACPI_SUCCESS(acpi_get_handle(phandle, "_GTF", &tmp))) ||
- (ACPI_SUCCESS(acpi_get_handle(phandle, "_GTM", &tmp))) ||
- (ACPI_SUCCESS(acpi_get_handle(phandle, "_STM", &tmp))) ||
- (ACPI_SUCCESS(acpi_get_handle(phandle, "_SDD", &tmp))))
- return 0;
+ if (!acpi_has_method(handle, "_EJ0"))
+ return false;
+ if (acpi_ata_match(handle))
+ return true;
+ if (ACPI_FAILURE(acpi_get_parent(handle, &phandle)))
+ return false;
- return -ENODEV;
+ return acpi_ata_match(phandle);
}
/*
* acpi_dock_match - see if an acpi object has a _DCK method
*/
-static int acpi_dock_match(acpi_handle handle)
+bool acpi_dock_match(acpi_handle handle)
{
- acpi_handle tmp;
- return acpi_get_handle(handle, "_DCK", &tmp);
+ return acpi_has_method(handle, "_DCK");
}
const char *acpi_device_hid(struct acpi_device *device)
@@ -1609,34 +1608,27 @@ static void acpi_add_id(struct acpi_device_pnp *pnp, const char *dev_id)
* lacks the SMBUS01 HID and the methods do not have the necessary "_"
* prefix. Work around this.
*/
-static int acpi_ibm_smbus_match(acpi_handle handle)
+static bool acpi_ibm_smbus_match(acpi_handle handle)
{
acpi_handle h_dummy;
- struct acpi_buffer path = {ACPI_ALLOCATE_BUFFER, NULL};
- int result;
+ char node_name[ACPI_PATH_SEGMENT_LENGTH];
+ struct acpi_buffer path = { sizeof(node_name), node_name };
if (!dmi_name_in_vendors("IBM"))
- return -ENODEV;
+ return false;
/* Look for SMBS object */
- result = acpi_get_name(handle, ACPI_SINGLE_NAME, &path);
- if (result)
- return result;
-
- if (strcmp("SMBS", path.pointer)) {
- result = -ENODEV;
- goto out;
- }
+ if (ACPI_FAILURE(acpi_get_name(handle, ACPI_SINGLE_NAME, &path)) ||
+ strcmp("SMBS", path.pointer))
+ return false;
/* Does it have the necessary (but misnamed) methods? */
- result = -ENODEV;
if (ACPI_SUCCESS(acpi_get_handle(handle, "SBI", &h_dummy)) &&
ACPI_SUCCESS(acpi_get_handle(handle, "SBR", &h_dummy)) &&
ACPI_SUCCESS(acpi_get_handle(handle, "SBW", &h_dummy)))
- result = 0;
-out:
- kfree(path.pointer);
- return result;
+ return true;
+
+ return false;
}
static void acpi_set_pnp_ids(acpi_handle handle, struct acpi_device_pnp *pnp,
@@ -1684,11 +1676,11 @@ static void acpi_set_pnp_ids(acpi_handle handle, struct acpi_device_pnp *pnp,
*/
if (acpi_is_video_device(handle))
acpi_add_id(pnp, ACPI_VIDEO_HID);
- else if (ACPI_SUCCESS(acpi_bay_match(handle)))
+ else if (acpi_bay_match(handle))
acpi_add_id(pnp, ACPI_BAY_HID);
- else if (ACPI_SUCCESS(acpi_dock_match(handle)))
+ else if (acpi_dock_match(handle))
acpi_add_id(pnp, ACPI_DOCK_HID);
- else if (!acpi_ibm_smbus_match(handle))
+ else if (acpi_ibm_smbus_match(handle))
acpi_add_id(pnp, ACPI_SMBUS_IBM_HID);
else if (list_empty(&pnp->ids) && handle == ACPI_ROOT_OBJECT) {
acpi_add_id(pnp, ACPI_BUS_HID); /* \_SB, LNXSYBUS */
diff --git a/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h b/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
index 3db3b97..a4e4427 100644
--- a/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
+++ b/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
@@ -60,6 +60,9 @@ acpi_get_physical_device_location(acpi_handle handle, struct acpi_pld_info **pld
acpi_status acpi_evaluate_ej0(acpi_handle handle);
acpi_status acpi_evaluate_lck(acpi_handle handle, int lock);
bool acpi_has_method(acpi_handle handle, char *name);
+bool acpi_ata_match(acpi_handle handle);
+bool acpi_bay_match(acpi_handle handle);
+bool acpi_dock_match(acpi_handle handle);
#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
--
1.8.1.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/