Re: [RFC] perf: need to expose sched_clock to correlate user sampleswith kernel samples

[David Ahern]

With all the perf ioctl extensions tossed out the past day or so I 
wanted to revive this request. Still need a solution to the problem of 
correlating perf_clock to other clocks ...

On 2/1/13 7:18 AM, Pawel Moll wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'd like to revive the topic...
>
> On Tue, 2012-10-16 at 18:23 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Tue, 2012-10-16 at 12:13 +0200, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > There are many situations where we want to correlate events happening at
> > > the user level with samples recorded in the perf_event kernel sampling buffer.
> > > For instance, we might want to correlate the call to a function or creation of
> > > a file with samples. Similarly, when we want to monitor a JVM with jitted code,
> > > we need to be able to correlate jitted code mappings with perf event samples
> > > for symbolization.
> > >
> > > Perf_events allows timestamping of samples with PERF_SAMPLE_TIME.
> > > That causes each PERF_RECORD_SAMPLE to include a timestamp
> > > generated by calling the local_clock() -> sched_clock_cpu() function.
> > >
> > > To make correlating user vs. kernel samples easy, we would need to
> > > access that sched_clock() functionality. However, none of the existing
> > > clock calls permit this at this point. They all return timestamps which are
> > > not using the same source and/or offset as sched_clock.
> > >
> > > I believe a similar issue exists with the ftrace subsystem.
> > >
> > > The problem needs to be adressed in a portable manner. Solutions
> > > based on reading TSC for the user level to reconstruct sched_clock()
> > > don't seem appropriate to me.
> > >
> > > One possibility to address this limitation would be to extend clock_gettime()
> > > with a new clock time, e.g., CLOCK_PERF.
> > >
> > > However, I understand that sched_clock_cpu() provides ordering guarantees only
> > > when invoked on the same CPU repeatedly, i.e., it's not globally synchronized.
> > > But we already have to deal with this problem when merging samples obtained
> > > from different CPU sampling buffer in per-thread mode. So this is not
> > > necessarily
> > > a showstopper.
> > >
> > > Alternatives could be to use uprobes but that's less practical to setup.
> > >
> > > Anyone with better ideas?
> >
> > You forgot to CC the time people ;-)
> >
> > I've no problem with adding CLOCK_PERF (or another/better name).
> >
> > Thomas, John?
>
> I've just faced the same issue - correlating an event in userspace with
> data from the perf stream, but to my mind what I want to get is a value
> returned by perf_clock() _in the current "session" context_.
>
> Stephane didn't like the idea of opening a "fake" perf descriptor in
> order to get the timestamp, but surely one must have the "session"
> already running to be interested in such data in the first place? So I
> think the ioctl() idea is not out of place here... How about the simple
> change below?
>
> Regards
>
> Pawel
>
> 8<---
>  From 2ad51a27fbf64bf98cee190efc3fbd7002819692 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@xxxxxxx>
> Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2013 14:03:56 +0000
> Subject: [PATCH] perf: Add ioctl to return current time value
>
> To co-relate user space events with the perf events stream
> a current (as in: "what time(stamp) is it now?") time value
> must be made available.
>
> This patch adds a perf ioctl that makes this possible.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@xxxxxxx>
> ---
>   include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h |    1 +
>   kernel/events/core.c            |    8 ++++++++
>   2 files changed, 9 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h b/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
> index 4f63c05..b745fb0 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
> @@ -316,6 +316,7 @@ struct perf_event_attr {
>   #define PERF_EVENT_IOC_PERIOD		_IOW('$', 4, __u64)
>   #define PERF_EVENT_IOC_SET_OUTPUT	_IO ('$', 5)
>   #define PERF_EVENT_IOC_SET_FILTER	_IOW('$', 6, char *)
> +#define PERF_EVENT_IOC_GET_TIME		_IOR('$', 7, __u64)
>
>   enum perf_event_ioc_flags {
>   	PERF_IOC_FLAG_GROUP		= 1U << 0,
> diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
> index 301079d..4202b1c 100644
> --- a/kernel/events/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/events/core.c
> @@ -3298,6 +3298,14 @@ static long perf_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
>   	case PERF_EVENT_IOC_SET_FILTER:
>   		return perf_event_set_filter(event, (void __user *)arg);
>
> +	case PERF_EVENT_IOC_GET_TIME:
> +	{
> +		u64 time = perf_clock();
> +		if (copy_to_user((void __user *)arg, &time, sizeof(time)))
> +			return -EFAULT;
> +		return 0;
> +	}
> +
>   	default:
>   		return -ENOTTY;
>   	}

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/