Re: [RFC Patch net-next 1/5] net: introduce generic union inet_addr

[Andy Shevchenko]

On Thu, 2013-06-27 at 14:43 +0800, Cong Wang wrote: 
> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <amwang@xxxxxxxxxx>

I was about to answer for the Daniel's patch about %pig.

Daniel, could you resend your patch series to the LKML, since it touches
lib/vsprintf.c.
Also, regarding to your patch 2/2, could it be possible to split it to
two parts: first substitutes SCTP macros not related to IP addresses and
second one is explicitly targeting against SCTP_DEBUG_PRINTK_IPADDR ?
By the way, in some places in 2/2 you didn't change open coded function
name to the '"%s: ...", __func__, ...'.

Cong, I don't think is a good idea to update lib/ code and net/ code in
one patch, since that are logically a bit different. lib/ code sounds
more common, it's better if it leads separately this series.


-- 
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Intel Finland Oy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/