Re: [PATCH] Documentation: dt: bindings: TI WiLink modules

[Luciano Coelho]

On Thu, 2013-06-27 at 08:23 -0500, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> On 06/27/2013 08:19 AM, Luciano Coelho wrote:
> > On Thu, 2013-06-27 at 08:15 -0500, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> >> On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 7:58 AM, Luciano Coelho <coelho@xxxxxx> wrote:
> >>> For the actual DTS files, I could add a wilink.dtsi with enumerations
> >>> for these values so they could be used in the node definitions.  But I'm
> >>> not sure it's going to be that valuable in the end.
> >> The  way GPIO HIGH was defined might help to provide guidance I think :)
> >
> > Where? As far as I can see, the GPIO flags are defined in a bitmap.
> 
> include/dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h

Thanks! I don't see these macros used anywhere, though.

> And corresponding kernel header:
> include/linux/of_gpio.h

This seems to be a completely different thing.  This is the header that
contains the helper functions to get GPIO-related device tree nodes,
isn't it?


> just a hint. not saying frequencies were defined in header. for systems 
> that define frequencies - example cpufreq OPPs, clock node usage, we do 
> not use indexing to frequency, instead, that is the responsibility of 
> driver to convert frequency back to required index.
> git grep frequency Documentation/devicetree/bindings gives you how the 
> precedence looks like.
> 
> Personally, if given a choice, I'd go with actual frequencies rather 
> than indexes.

If I do that, I need to add also a separate flag to define whether the
XTAL clock is used or not.  For instance, we have 26MHz and 26MHz
crystal; and 38.4MHz and 38.4MHz crystal...

--
Luca.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/