Re: [PATCH 2/8] sched: Track NUMA hinting faults on per-node basis

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 03:38:01PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> @@ -503,6 +503,18 @@ DECLARE_PER_CPU(struct rq, runqueues);
>  #define cpu_curr(cpu)		(cpu_rq(cpu)->curr)
>  #define raw_rq()		(&__raw_get_cpu_var(runqueues))
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING
> +extern void sched_setnuma(struct task_struct *p, int node, int shared);

Stray line; you're introducing that function later with a different
signature.

> +static inline void task_numa_free(struct task_struct *p)
> +{
> +	kfree(p->numa_faults);
> +}
> +#else /* CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING */
> +static inline void task_numa_free(struct task_struct *p)
> +{
> +}
> +#endif /* CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING */
> +
>  #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
>  
>  #define rcu_dereference_check_sched_domain(p) \
> -- 
> 1.8.1.4
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/