Re: cgroup: status-quo and userland efforts

From: Serge Hallyn
Date: Thu Jun 27 2013 - 14:51:20 EST


Quoting Tejun Heo (tj@xxxxxxxxxx):
> Hello, Serge.
>
> On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 01:14:57PM -0500, Serge Hallyn wrote:
> > I should find a good, up-to-date summary of the current behaviors of
> > each controller so I can talk more intelligently about it. (I'll
> > start by looking at the kernel Documentation/cgroups, but don't
> > feel too confident that they'll be uptodate :)
>
> Heh, it's hopelessly outdated. Sorry about that. I'll get around to
> updating it eventually. Right now everything is in flux.
>
> > Right, I'm not attached to my toy implementation at all - except for
> > the ability, in some fashion, to have nested agents which don't have
> > cgroupfs access but talk to another agent to get the job done.
>
> I think it probably would be better to allow organization and RO

What do you mean by "organization"? Creating cgroups and moving tasks
between them, without setting other cgroup values?

> access to knobs and stat files inside containers, for lower overhead,
> if nothing else, and have comm channel for operations which need
> supervision at a wider level.
>
> Thanks.
>
> --
> tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/