[PATCH 3.9-stable] iwlwifi: fix rate control regression

[Jonghwan Choi]

This patch looks like it should be in the 3.9-stable tree, should we apply
it?

------------------

From: "Moshe Benji <Moshe.Benji@xxxxxxxxx>"

commit 622ebe994f6866b8d46ee5d3bcc329ed65d3722d upstream

Since driver does not use control.rates[0].count, we have never set that
variable. But currently, after rate control API rewrite, this is required
by mac80211. Otherwise legacy rates control does not work and we transmit
always at 1Mbit/s on pre 11n networks.

[same fix as for iwlegacy, thanks Stanislaw!]

Signed-off-by: Moshe Benji <Moshe.Benji@xxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Jonghwan Choi <jhbird.choi@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/dvm/rs.c |    2 +-
 drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/mvm/rs.c |    1 +
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/dvm/rs.c
b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/dvm/rs.c
index abe3042..5de2dbf 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/dvm/rs.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/dvm/rs.c
@@ -2799,7 +2799,7 @@ static void rs_get_rate(void *priv_r, struct
ieee80211_sta *sta, void *priv_sta,
 		info->control.rates[0].flags = 0;
 	}
 	info->control.rates[0].idx = rate_idx;
-
+	info->control.rates[0].count = 1;
 }
 
 static void *rs_alloc_sta(void *priv_rate, struct ieee80211_sta *sta,
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/mvm/rs.c
b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/mvm/rs.c
index 56b636d..fefcbc5 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/mvm/rs.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/mvm/rs.c
@@ -2544,6 +2544,7 @@ static void rs_get_rate(void *mvm_r, struct
ieee80211_sta *sta, void *mvm_sta,
 		info->control.rates[0].flags = 0;
 	}
 	info->control.rates[0].idx = rate_idx;
+	info->control.rates[0].count = 1;
 }
 
 static void *rs_alloc_sta(void *mvm_rate, struct ieee80211_sta *sta,
-- 
1.7.9.5

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/