Re: [PATCH] Optimize wait_sb_inodes()

[OGAWA Hirofumi]

Theodore Ts'o <tytso@xxxxxxx> writes:

> On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 08:37:40AM +0900, OGAWA Hirofumi wrote:
>> 
>> Well, anyway, it is simple. This issue was came as the performance
>> regression when I was experimenting to use kernel bdi flusher from own
>> flusher. The issue was sync(2) like I said.  And this was just I
>> couldn't solve this issue by tux3 side unlike other optimizations.
>
> A performance regression using fsstress?  That's not a program
> intended to be a useful benchmark for measuring performance.

Right. fsstress is used as stress tool for me too as part of CI, with
background vmstat 1. Anyway, it is why I noticed this.

I agree it would not be high priority. But I don't think we should stop
to optimize it.

Thanks.
-- 
OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/