Re: [PATCHv6 0/5] xen: maintain an accurate persistent clock in morecases

[Thomas Gleixner]

On Fri, 28 Jun 2013, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 03:14:42PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Thu, 27 Jun 2013, David Vrabel wrote:
> > > These series fixes the above limitations and depends on "x86: increase
> > > precision of x86_platform.get/set_wallclock()" which was previously
> > > posted.
> > 
> > So I'd like to merge that in the following way:
> > 
> > I pick up patches 1-3 and stick them into tip timers/for-xen and merge
> > that branch into timers/core. When picking up 1/6, I'll drop the xen
> > part of that, so timers/core will not hold any xen specific bits.
> > 
> > Then the xen folks can pull timers/for-xen and apply the xen specific
> > stuff on top.
> 
> Wouldn't it be easier for you to pick the "xen part of that" as well?
> I am OK with you doing that and it all going through your tree.

I can do that, if that's not conflicting with other xen/x86 stuff
outside of timers/core.

Thanks,

	tglx

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/