On Fri, 2013-06-28 at 17:53 +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote:On 06/28/2013 05:44 PM, Joe Perches wrote:[]On Fri, 2013-06-28 at 14:05 +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote:In order to avoid making code that deals with printing both, IPv4 and
IPv6 addresses, unnecessary complicated as for example ...
Should any other include other than net/addrconf be needed?I'm not sure I understand this question.
the #include <net/addrconf.h> indirectly
includes <linux/in.h> and <linux/in6.h>
but because this now uses struct sockaddr and family
it may be more sensible to directly include those.
No worries really, it works now.
+char *ip6_addr_string_sa(char *buf, char *end, const struct sockaddr_in6 *sa,[]
+ struct printf_spec spec, const char *fmt)
+{
+ char fmt6[2] = { fmt[0], '6'};
This looks odd to me. why not use a bool compressed
flag and identify this before the isalpha loop and not
have fmt6 at all?
Well, we have a bool called 'have_c' that identifies if 'c' was specified. To have
the same behaviour as with %pI6, this is used to create a temporary fmt that we then
can pass to ip6_string(). If you look at ip6_addr_string(), it's done the same way,
It's a little different than that.
and by that, we stay compatible in behaviour.
That's slightly tricky, ip6_addr_string just needs "I" or "i"
But, your implementation, your choice,