Re: [PATCH v2] vmpressure: implement strict mode

[Anton Vorontsov]

On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 02:45:07PM -0400, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Jun 2013 10:09:17 -0700
> Anton Vorontsov <anton@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > So, I would now argue that the current scheme is perfectly OK and can do
> > everything you can do with the "strict" one,
> 
> I forgot commenting this bit. This is not true, because I don't want a
> low fd to be notified on critical level. The current interface just
> can't do that.

Why can't you use poll() and demultiplex the events? Check if there is an
event in the crit fd, and if there is, then just ignore all the rest.

> However, it *is* possible to make non-strict work on strict if we make
> strict default _and_ make reads on memory.pressure_level return
> available events. Just do this on app initialization:
> 
> for each event in memory.pressure_level; do
> 	/* register eventfd to be notified on "event" */
> done

This scheme registers "all" events. Here is more complicated case:

Old kernels, pressure_level reads:

  low, med, crit

The app just wants to listen for med level.

New kernels, pressure_level reads:

  low, FOO, med, BAR, crit

How would application decide which of FOO and BAR are ex-med levels?

Anton
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/