Hello Sebastian,
using your DT patches[1] (on top of 3.10) I can't get the second
ethernet to work on my kirkwood board.
in my dts file I use:
&mdio { status = "okay"; };
ð0 { status = "okay"; ethernet0-port@0 { speed =<1000>; duplex
=<1>; }; };
ð1 { status = "okay"; ethernet1-port@1 { speed =<1000>; duplex
=<1>; }; };
(Both macs are connected to a switch, so use a fixed link, and no
phy).
Eth1 gets probed fine, but never gets a link when brought up, and
trying to bring it down again hangs the board hard.
Using Florian's older patches, it is brought up fine and works (after
adapting the node names of course).
Also I noticed that you named eth1's ethernet1-port node wrongly in
(at least) your kirkwood conversion patch[2]; you used
ð1 { status = "okay"; ethernet1-port@0 { must be @1--^ phy-handle
=<ðphy1>; }; };
which results in a null pointer access on boot:
... [ 12.627136] mv643xx_eth_port mv643xx_eth_port.0 eth0: port 0
with MAC address ... [ 12.635955] Unable to handle kernel NULL
pointer dereference at virtual address 00000000 [ 12.644100] pgd =
c0004000 [ 12.646821] [00000000] *pgd=00000000 [ 12.650418]
Internal error: Oops: 5 [#1] ARM [ 12.654702] Modules linked in: [
12.657778] CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper Not tainted 3.10.0 #10 [
12.663634] task: c7827d60 ti: c782e000 task.ti: c782e000 [
12.669073] PC is at mv643xx_eth_probe+0x98/0x708 ...
Regards Jonas
P.S: I'm not on any ML you posted these patches to, so I could not
reply directly.
[1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2632571/ etc [2]
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2811861/