Re: [PATCH] sched: smart wake-affine

[Michael Wang]

On 07/08/2013 04:49 PM, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-07-08 at 10:21 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: 
>> On Sun, Jul 07, 2013 at 08:43:25AM +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
>>> On Fri, 2013-07-05 at 14:16 +0800, Michael Wang wrote:
>>>
>>>> PeterZ has suggested some optimization which I sent out yesterday, I
>>>> suppose they haven't been included into this test yet, correct?
>>>
>>> No, that was with both v3 patches applied.  hackbench -l 1000 delta
>>> tracked to next pull/build fwiw, but I don't see anything noteworthy
>>> elsewhere, so I'm filing it under "tasks/core ~= zillion ~= hohum".
>>
>> OK, I'll apply the patches, we'll see what happens. If there significant
>> fallout we'll immediately have more information anyway ;-)
> 
> Yup.  It's a repeatable oddity on my box, but it doesn't even track to
> itself when using different hackbench parameters.  All I can really
> conclude from test results is "golly, changing stuff affects stuff" :) 

If there is problems, they will show up sooner or later, and we just
conquer them at that time ;-)

And thanks again for all the help you've done :)

Regards,
Michael Wang

> 
> -Mike
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/