Re: [PATCH 1/4] lkdtm: fix stack protector trigger

[Kees Cook]

Hi,

I'd like to get this series added to lkdtm. Can someone take a moment
to review or ack them?

Thanks,

-Kees

On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 11:37 AM, Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The -fstack-protector compiler flag will only build stack protections if
> a character array is seen. Additionally, the offset to the saved
> instruction pointer changes based on architecture, so stomp much harder
> (64 bytes) when corrupting the stack.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/misc/lkdtm.c |    6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/misc/lkdtm.c b/drivers/misc/lkdtm.c
> index 08aad69..adb6bde 100644
> --- a/drivers/misc/lkdtm.c
> +++ b/drivers/misc/lkdtm.c
> @@ -295,10 +295,10 @@ static void lkdtm_do_action(enum ctype which)
>                 (void) recursive_loop(0);
>                 break;
>         case CT_CORRUPT_STACK: {
> -               volatile u32 data[8];
> -               volatile u32 *p = data;
> +               /* Make sure the compiler creates and uses an 8 char array. */
> +               volatile char data[8];
>
> -               p[12] = 0x12345678;
> +               memset((void *)data, 0, 64);
>                 break;
>         }
>         case CT_UNALIGNED_LOAD_STORE_WRITE: {
> --
> 1.7.9.5
>



-- 
Kees Cook
Chrome OS Security
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/