Re: [PATCH] sched: smart wake-affine

[Michael Wang]

On 07/09/2013 10:36 AM, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
[snip]
>> 2. is the 3.10-rc5 in image also disabled the hyperthreading?
> 
> Yes, I happened to have data already collected for 3.10-rc5. While the
> runs with this patch was with -rc7, unless there was some performance
> related commit I missed, I don't think the performance difference was
> because of that.
> 
>> 3. is the v3 patch set show the same issue?
> 
> Uhmmm shoot, I didn't realize there was a v3, sorry about that.
> 
> /me takes another look at the thread.

V3 will reduce the overhead, should make things better, especially when
workload is high and platform is big (your box is really what I desired
;-), honestly).

And if it is possible, comparison based on the same basement will be
better :)

Regards,
Michael Wang

> 
> Thanks,
> Davidlohr
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/