On 07/08/2013 12:43 PM, George Cherian wrote:I wanted to add phy wakeup control also, but currently phy_ops dont have an op for wkup_ctrlThis patch series adds phy support for AM335X platform.No, I don't like this all. You did the one thing I tried to avoid while
This patch series is based on Generic PHY framework [1].
This series has
- adds dual musb instances support for am335x platform (just for testing)
- adds phy-amxxxx-usb driver used in AMxxxx platforms
- adds dt bindings for the phys
- removes usb-phy and replaced with generic phy apis in glue layer
posting my quick-and-dirty phy driver recently: You duplicated a lot of
code which can be served by the nop driver and added only power
on/power off callbacks.
In numbers:Yes definitely , I liked the way you split the device node. Probably I should base on your dt patch and add7 files changed, 316 insertions(+), 70 deletions(-)vs
2 files changed, 117 insertions, 12 deletions
I assumed you had also the OTG callbacks (set host/device mode) and
wake up but I don't see it there.
Adding a power regulator would do the same job, wouldn't it? If the phy
driver remains just doing power on/off I suggest simply adding a power
regulator. If it will do more I would move the am35xx specific bits
into a separate file and glue it to the nop driver.
What else? The abstraction in device tree is wrong. It remains wrong if
add stuff on top to it.
We need two nodes each one with a glue layer and a musb child node. TheSame as above I just did it for quick testing (mentioned in the commit log).
instances crap in kernel has to vanish.
Also that means your phy nodesyes true.
are wrong. This is not musb with two ports but two musb instances each
with one port.
Sebastian