Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen: remove unused Kconfig parameter

[Jan Beulich]

>>> On 09.07.13 at 16:48, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Dom0 has been both - but there is nothing wrong with seperating these
> two labels. And therein I was thinking that the 'hardware backend domain'
> should be the introduced. I am not good with names so the best option
> seems CONFIG_XEN_PRIVILIGED, but that sounds to be like 'controlling 
> domain'.
> 
> Any good ideas for names? CONFIG_XEN_HARDWARE_DOMAIN ? 
> CONFIG_XEN_PRIVILIGED_DOMAIN?

Following the naming in the hypervisor, CONFIG_XEN_HARDWARE_DOMAIN
and CONFIG_XEN_CONTROL_DOMAIN would seem reasonable to me.

Jan

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/