Re: [PATCH v4 3/7] Documentation: DT: update atmel SSC with DMAbinding

[Mark Brown]

On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 11:48:27AM +0200, Richard Genoud wrote:
> 2013/7/9 Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>:

> > ...this first example is now invalid and should probably just be being
> > extended with the new required properties.

> Well, I have to rewrite that to make it clearer.
> The thing is:
> with "atmel,at91rm9200-ssc" the SSC doesn't work with DMA.
> with "atmel,at91sam9g45-ssc", the SSC work ONLY with DMA.

> So the dmas/dma-names properties are only required for g45-ssc, and
> useless for rm9200-ssc

> Maybe the best will be to write a paragraph for g45-ssc and another
> for rm9200-ssc, even if there's some identical lines between them.

OK, or just write a section "Required for devices with compatible X".

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature