Re: [PATCH v2 00/14] Platform Framebuffers and SimpleDRM

From: David Herrmann
Date: Wed Jul 10 2013 - 13:28:42 EST


Hi

On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 11:02 PM, Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 07/04/2013 06:25 AM, David Herrmann wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> This series changes the way we handle firmware framebuffers on x86 systems. On
>> other architectures the recently introduced "simple-framebuffer"
>> platform-devices provide a sane and proper way to handle firmware framebuffers.
>> So why not use it on x86, too?
>
> Tested-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> (This time I didn't see any issue with the FB content being blank; I
> must have forgotten a console= command-line parameter or something the
> last time around)

I think I had some error in the pseudo_palette handling (which I now
copied from simplefb.c), but I am not sure why it didn't work in v1.
Thanks a lot for testing!

Regards
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/