Re: [RFC] [PATCH 1/2 v2] x86: introduce int3-based instructionpatching

[Steven Rostedt]

On Thu, 2013-07-11 at 21:43 +0200, Jiri Kosina wrote:

> OTOH we apparently don't need the one after the text_poke() below, as 
> syncing the cores just after patching the first byte afterwards provides 
> safe enough guard (at least according to hpa's words back in 2010 :) ).

Right, but I'm paranoid enough to keep it anyway ;-)

-- Steve


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/