Re: [PATCH 0/2] pkt_sched: sch_qfq: efficiency and codestyleimprovements

[David Miller]

From: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 15:46:07 +0200

> Hi,
> this patchset tries to address the two issues raised by Dave in
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=136254542019113&w=2
> 
> The first of these issues has been also raised by
> David Laight:
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=136256446624557&w=2
> 
>> Although two topics for possibly resolving later:
>> 
>> 1) That 1ULL bit mask fix is quite expensive on 32-bit, it would
>>     probably be cheaper to test for that case using a helper function
>>     that nops out on 64-bit.  Although this is not so important.
>> 
> I have tried to find a simple solution, based on the properties of the mask.
> It is in the first patch.
> 
>> 2) That static inline forward declaration is ugly, better to remove
>>     the inline tag (let the compiler handle it) or move the function
>>     above all the call sites.
>> 
> Done by the second patch.

Looks good, thanks for doing this, both applied.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/