Re: [PATCH] mm: mempolicy: turn vma_set_policy() intovma_dup_policy()
From: Andrew Morton
Date: Thu Jul 11 2013 - 18:33:19 EST
On Thu, 11 Jul 2013 15:27:46 -0700 (PDT) David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Jul 2013, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 11 Jul 2013 15:13:03 -0700 (PDT) David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > > > +int vma_dup_policy(struct vm_area_struct *src, struct vm_area_struct *dst)
> > > > +{
> > > > + struct mempolicy *pol = mpol_dup(vma_policy(src));
> > > > +
> > > > + if (IS_ERR(pol))
> > > > + return PTR_ERR(pol);
> > >
> > > PTR_ERR() returns long, so vma_dup_policy() needs to return long.
> >
> > hm, really? vma_dup_policy() returns an errno and errnos have type "int".
> >
> > Arguably it is PTR_ERR() which returns the wrong type...
> >
>
> PTR_ERR() may not imply IS_ERR(),
Well why not. Are we saying that code can legitimately convert the
PTR_ERR() return value back into a pointer? If so that sounds nuts.
> which I believe Rusty is trying to fix
> with his series that fixes up abuses of PTR_ERR().
Well I hope all of this will be completely documented in err.h.
Otherwise the abuses will simply continue.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/