Re: [PATCH-v3 00/17] staging/lustre: fix various build issues

[Peng Tao]

On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 8:07 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 12:13:57PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> On Mon, 15 Jul 2013 11:40:30 -0700 Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> > On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 10:16:29AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
>> > > On Mon, 2013-07-15 at 22:27 +0800, Peng Tao wrote:
>> > > > Hi Greg,
>> > > >
>> > > > Now that 3.11-rc1 is out, please consider queuing following patches to
>> > > > fix various Lustre client build issues. I've verified that we can now
>> > > > pass build on sparc/mips/s390/powerpc/x86, both 32bits and 64bits.
>> > >
>> > > These patches apply to linus' current, but not to -next
>> > > where other lustre patches have already been applied.
>> >
>> > What trees are those in?  I have nothing in my staging-next branch right
>> > now, so they didn't come from there, which is where I will be applying
>> > this to.
>>
>> See the five patches I sent you on July 8 ;)
>>
>> I'll resend.
>
> I got them, I couldn't apply them until after -rc1 is out, so I'll queue
> them up later this week.
>
Hi Greg and Andrew,

One issue with the five patches is that the shrinker API change is not
in Linus' tree. So if Greg merges them in staging tree, Lustre cannot
build there. Is it OK to break in staging tree and just to make sure
-next can build?

Thanks,
Tao
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/