Re: [PATCH] Documentation: update references to v2.6.x indevelopment-process

[Stephen Rothwell]

Hi Paul,

On Mon, 15 Jul 2013 22:13:50 -0400 Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On a similar note, I was thinking about the recent thread on linux-next
> where we were indicating that people shouldn't rebase linux-next content
> on a whim, and that new devel (vs. bugfix) content shouldn't appear in
> the linux-next content during the merge window.  There is no question
> that the linux-next process is integral to the main flow of patches to
> mainline, so I think Documentation/development-process/2.Process (the
> same file) should also capture those points in the linux-next section.
> Do you have some pre-canned text we can insert there, or should I draft
> something up for you to review?

The latter would be certainly easier for me :-)  If that is not easy, let
me know and I will write something (even without swearing ;-)).

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Attachment: pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature