Re: [PATCH v5 3/7] cpufreq:acpi:x86: Adjust the acpi-cpufreq.c code towork with common boost solution

[Lukasz Majewski]

On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 15:34:02 +0530 Viresh Kumar viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx
wrote,
> On 4 July 2013 14:20, Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >  static void __init acpi_cpufreq_boost_init(void)
> > @@ -953,33 +937,22 @@ static void __init
> > acpi_cpufreq_boost_init(void) if (!msrs)
> >                         return;
> >
> > -               boost_supported = true;
> > -               boost_enabled = boost_state(0);
> > +               cpufreq_set_boost_enabled(boost_state(0));
> > +               acpi_cpufreq_driver.boost_supported = true;
> 
> You are again doing the same mistake. Boost must be
> always supported for acpi-cpufreq with read permissions, as it was
> earlier.

The boost attribute is exported to sysfs only when boost is supported
by the driver (as we had agreed earlier).  

The problem here is that the original acpi-cpufreq.c file had two
static flags:
static bool boost_enabled, boost_supported;

Both of them are not needed at acpi-cpufreq, since:
1. boost_enabled is defined at cpufreq.c core file.
2. boost_supported is defined at struct cpufreq_driver
(acpi_cpufreq_driver).

I've reused the boost_supported from acpi_cpufreq_driver structure to
avoid code duplication.


-- 
Best regards,

Lukasz Majewski

Samsung R&D Institute Poland (SRPOL) | Linux Platform Group
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/