Re: [PATCH 4/7] perf completion: modernize style

[Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo]

Em Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 06:11:28PM +0530, Ramkumar Ramachandra escreveu:
> Signed-off-by: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  tools/perf/bash_completion | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/perf/bash_completion b/tools/perf/bash_completion
> index d2598be..8c04f5d 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/bash_completion
> +++ b/tools/perf/bash_completion
> @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ function_exists()
>  }
>  
>  function_exists __ltrim_colon_completions ||
> -__ltrim_colon_completions()
> +__ltrim_colon_completions ()

Huh? Why would this be more "modern", if both are equivalent, I think
applying the same rules as we have for C code applies here.

- Arnaldo

>  {
>  	if [[ "$1" == *:* && "$COMP_WORDBREAKS" == *:* ]]; then
>  		# Remove colon-word prefix from COMPREPLY items
> @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ __ltrim_colon_completions()
>  }
>  
>  type perf &>/dev/null &&
> -_perf()
> +_perf ()
>  {
>  	local cur prev cmd
>  
> -- 
> 1.8.3.1.643.gebeea52.dirty
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/