Re: [PATCH 02/18] sched: Track NUMA hinting faults on per-node basis

From: Peter Zijlstra
Date: Wed Jul 17 2013 - 06:50:59 EST


On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 04:20:04PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> index cc03cfd..c5f773d 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
> +++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
> @@ -503,6 +503,17 @@ DECLARE_PER_CPU(struct rq, runqueues);
> #define cpu_curr(cpu) (cpu_rq(cpu)->curr)
> #define raw_rq() (&__raw_get_cpu_var(runqueues))
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING
> +static inline void task_numa_free(struct task_struct *p)
> +{
> + kfree(p->numa_faults);
> +}
> +#else /* CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING */
> +static inline void task_numa_free(struct task_struct *p)
> +{
> +}
> +#endif /* CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING */
> +
> #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
>
> #define rcu_dereference_check_sched_domain(p) \


I also need the below hunk to make it compile:

--- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
#include <linux/spinlock.h>
#include <linux/stop_machine.h>
#include <linux/tick.h>
+#include <linux/slab.h>

#include "cpupri.h"
#include "cpuacct.h"



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/