Re: [PATCH] iommu/vt-d: Expand interrupt remapping quirk to coverx58 chipset

[Don Dutile]

On 07/17/2013 07:13 AM, Neil Horman wrote:
> Recently we added an early quirk to detect 5500/5520 chipsets with early
> revisions that had problems with irq draining with interrupt remapping enabled:
>
> commit 03bbcb2e7e292838bb0244f5a7816d194c911d62
> Author: Neil Horman<nhorman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date:   Tue Apr 16 16:38:32 2013 -0400
>
>      iommu/vt-d: add quirk for broken interrupt remapping on 55XX chipsets
>
> It turns out this same problem is present in the intel X58 chipset as well.  See
> errata 69 here:
> http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/chipsets/x58-express-specification-update.html
>
> This patch extends the pci early quirk so that the chip devices/revisions
> specified in the above update are also covered in the same way:
>
> Signed-off-by: Neil Horman<nhorman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich<jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
> CC: Jan Beulich<jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
> CC: Joerg Roedel<joro@xxxxxxxxxx>
> CC: Andrew Cooper<andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>
> CC: Malcolm Crossley<malcolm.crossley@xxxxxxxxxx>
> CC: Prarit Bhargava<prarit@xxxxxxxxxx>
> CC: Don Zickus<dzickus@xxxxxxxxxx>
> CC: Don Dutile<ddutile@xxxxxxxxxx>
> CC: Thomas Gleixner<tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> CC: Ingo Molnar<mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
> CC: "H. Peter Anvin"<hpa@xxxxxxxxx>
> CC: x86@xxxxxxxxxx
> CC: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> ---
> Note, this a repost of this patch.  Don and I talked about this offline again,
> and neither of us have been able to gather any information from intel on the
> subject.  While I understand his point that we should try to get confirmation
> about inclusive steppings that are affected by this errata, I feel like we
> should commit this patch based on the documentation we do have, and we can
> always ammend it later if Intel indicates other chips are affected.

and to back-up what Neil says...

Acked-by: Donald Dutile <ddutile@xxxxxxxxxx>

> ---
>   arch/x86/kernel/early-quirks.c | 15 +++++++++++++--
>   1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/early-quirks.c b/arch/x86/kernel/early-quirks.c
> index 94ab6b9..743d583 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/early-quirks.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/early-quirks.c
> @@ -196,15 +196,23 @@ static void __init ati_bugs_contd(int num, int slot, int func)
>   static void __init intel_remapping_check(int num, int slot, int func)
>   {
>   	u8 revision;
> +	u16 device;
>
> +	device = read_pci_config_16(num, slot, func, PCI_DEVICE_ID);
>   	revision = read_pci_config_byte(num, slot, func, PCI_REVISION_ID);
>
>   	/*
> -	 * Revision 0x13 of this chipset supports irq remapping
> -	 * but has an erratum that breaks its behavior, flag it as such
> + 	 * Revision 13 of all triggering devices id in this quirk have
> +	 * a problem draining interrupts when irq remapping is enabled,
> +	 * and should be flagged as broken.  Additionally revisions 0x12
> +	 * and 0x22 of device id 0x3405 has this problem.
>   	 */
>   	if (revision == 0x13)
>   		set_irq_remapping_broken();
> +	else if ((device == 0x3405)&&
> +	    ((revision == 0x12) ||
> +	     (revision == 0x22)))
> +		set_irq_remapping_broken();
>
>   }
>
> @@ -239,8 +247,11 @@ static struct chipset early_qrk[] __initdata = {
>   	  PCI_CLASS_SERIAL_SMBUS, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, ati_bugs_contd },
>   	{ PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x3403, PCI_CLASS_BRIDGE_HOST,
>   	  PCI_BASE_CLASS_BRIDGE, 0, intel_remapping_check },
> +	{ PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x3405, PCI_CLASS_BRIDGE_HOST,
> +	  PCI_BASE_CLASS_BRIDGE, 0, intel_remapping_check },
>   	{ PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x3406, PCI_CLASS_BRIDGE_HOST,
>   	  PCI_BASE_CLASS_BRIDGE, 0, intel_remapping_check },
> +	
>   	{}
>   };

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/