Re: [PATCH RESEND 0/3] Teach perf_trace_##call() to checkhlist_empty(perf_events)

[Ingo Molnar]

* Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hello.
> 
> The patches are the same, I only tried to update the changelogs a bit.
> I am also quoting my old email below, to explain what this hack tries
> to do.
> 
> 	Say, "perf record -e sched:sched_switch -p1".
> 
> 	Every task except /sbin/init will do perf_trace_sched_switch() and
> 	perf_trace_buf_prepare() + perf_trace_buf_submit for no reason(),
> 	it doesn't have a counter.
> 
> 	So it makes sense to add the fast-path check at the start of
> 	perf_trace_##call(),
> 
> 		if (hlist_empty(event_call->perf_events))
> 			return;
> 
> 	The problem is, we should not do this if __task != NULL (iow, if
> 	DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS() uses __perf_task()), perf_tp_event() has the
> 	additional code for this case.
> 
> 	So we should do
> 
> 		if (!__task && hlist_empty(event_call->perf_events))
> 			return;
> 
> 	But __task is changed by "{ assign; }" block right before
> 	perf_trace_buf_submit(). Too late for the fast-path check,
> 	we already called perf_trace_buf_prepare/fetch_regs.
> 
> 	So. After 2/3 __perf_task() (and __perf_count/addr) is called
> 	when ftrace_get_offsets_##call(args) evaluates the arguments,
> 	and we can check !__task && hlist_empty() right after that.
> 
> Oleg.

Nice improvement.

Peter, Steve, any objections?

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/