Re: [PATCH 3.11-rc1] crypto: Fix boot failure due to module dependency.
From: Rafael J. Wysocki
Date: Fri Jul 19 2013 - 08:48:02 EST
On Thursday, July 18, 2013 04:44:20 PM H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 07/18/2013 03:17 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >>
> >> alias x86cpu:vendor:*:family:*:model:*:feature:*0081* crct10dif_pclmul
> >>
> >> This should cause udev to load the crct10dif_pclml module when cpu
> >> support the PCLMULQDQ (feature code 0081). I did my testing during
> >> development on 3.10 and the module was indeed loaded.
> >>
> >> However, I found that the following commit under 3.11-rc1 broke
> >> the mechanism after some bisection.
> >>
> >> commit ac212b6980d8d5eda705864fc5a8ecddc6d6eacc
> >> Author: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> Date: Fri May 3 00:26:22 2013 +0200
> >>
> >> ACPI / processor: Use common hotplug infrastructure
> >> Split the ACPI processor driver into two parts, one that is
> >> non-modular, resides in the ACPI core and handles the enumeration
> >> and hotplug of processors and one that implements the rest of the
> >> existing processor driver functionality.
> >> Rafael, can you check and see if this can be fixed so those
> >> optimized
> >> crypto modules for Intel cpu that support them can be loaded?
> >
> > I think this is an ordering issue between udev startup and the time when
> > devices are registered.
> >
> > I wonder what happens if you put those modules into the initramfs image?
> >
>
> OK, this bothers me on some pretty deep level... a set of changes
> exclusively in drivers/acpi breaking functionality which had nothing to
> do with ACPI, specifically CPU-feature-based module loading.
Well, they are not exclusively in drivers/acpi, they are in drivers/base/cpu.c
too and that most likely is the responsible part.
> Please let me know what the investigation comes up with, or if I need to
> get more directly involved.
I will.
Thanks,
Rafael
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/