Re: [ 00/38] 3.9.11-stable review

[Shuah Khan]

On 07/19/2013 06:10 PM, Shuah Khan wrote:
> On 07/19/2013 05:50 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 12:25:24PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 04:45:25PM +0000, Shuah Khan wrote:
>>>> On 07/19/2013 09:34 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>>>> ---------------
>>>>> Note, this is the LAST 3.9-stable kernel release that I will be doing.
>>>>> Please move to the 3.10-stable branch as soon as possible.
>>>>> ---------------
>>>>>
>>>>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.9.11 release.
>>>>> There are 38 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>>>>> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>>>>> let me know.
>>>>>
>>>>> Responses should be made by Sun Jul 21 05:20:01 UTC 2013.
>>>>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>>>>>
>>>>> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>>>>> 	kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.9.11-rc1.gz
>>>>> and the diffstat can be found below.
>>>>>
>>>>> thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>> greg k-h
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Greg,
>>>>
>>>> Build failed with the following error:
>>>>
>>>>      LD      ipc/built-in.o
>>>>      CC [M]  fs/cifs/inode.o
>>>> fs/cifs/inode.c: In function ‘cifs_all_info_to_fattr’:
>>>> fs/cifs/inode.c:560:4: error: implicit declaration of function
>>>> ‘cifs_dbg’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>>>> cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
>>>> make[2]: *** [fs/cifs/inode.o] Error 1
>>>> make[1]: *** [fs/cifs] Error 2
>>>> make: *** [fs] Error 2
>>>> make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
>>>>      CC      security/selinux/hooks.o
>>>>
>>>> I have CONFIG_CIFS=m in my config and CONFIG_CIFS_DEBUG is disabled.
>>>> cifs_dbg() is not defined.
>>>
>>> Ugh, I thought I fixed that one...  I did it for the 3.4 and other
>>> trees, I'll go see what I did wrong...
>>
>> Ok, I've now fixed this, I don't know how it got through my tests, when
>> I tried it again, it failed.  Before it wasn't, odd...
>>
>> Anyway, there is a new -rc2 kernel patch at:
>>    	kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.9.11-rc2.gz
>>
>> If you could test that out, I would appreciate it, to ensure I didn't do
>> anything stupid with this one too.
>>
>> Ick, handling 4 kernels at once really takes its toll on me, this was
>> not a good review cycle...
>>
>> thanks,
>>
>> greg k-h
>>
>
> Greg,
>
> rc2 compiled on x86-64. I will run cross-compile tests and boot tests
> later on today or tomorrow morning and report the results.
>
> -- Shuah
>
> Shuah Khan, Linux Kernel Developer - Open Source Group Samsung Research
> America (Silicon Valley) shuah.kh@xxxxxxxxxxx | (970) 672-0658
>

3.9.11-rc2 boot tests passed on my test systems and cross-compile tests 
passed. No regressions in dmesgs.

-- Shuah

Shuah Khan, Linux Kernel Developer - Open Source Group Samsung Research 
America (Silicon Valley) shuah.kh@xxxxxxxxxxx | (970) 672-0658
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/