Re: [GIT PULL] x86 fixes for 3.11-rc2

[H. Peter Anvin]

On 07/20/2013 05:25 AM, George Spelvin wrote:
> It's marginal with only two call sites, but would it be worth factoring
> out the write-back function?  Something like this (untested) patch.
> It definitely makes the generated assembly cleaner.
> 
> (Signed-off-by: George Spelvin <linux@xxxxxxxxxxx> if you want it.)

Two call sites, statistically "never" executed, really doesn't justify
adding a new assembly function.  I was considering making a C wrapper,
though... I would also like to change these to using rdmsrl/wrmsrl.

	-hpa


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/